HACK and BUGG overlap by about 42%: there is a fair amount of double-up. BUGG is cheaper (0.47% vs 0.67% a year), about $200 a year less on $100,000. HACK is the bigger fund ($1.7b vs $25m). Both hold global cybersecurity companies. HACK is the older and much bigger fund; BUGG is newer, with a lower fee and a different index.
📅 As at 30 September 2026: fees, size, flows and returns from the TMX Australia funds report; overlap from published holdings as at 30 October 2026.
HACK
Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETFHACK invests in global companies that provide cybersecurity products and services.
BUGG
Global X Cybersecurity ETFBUGG invests in global companies that make money from cybersecurity products and services.
HACK vs BUGG side by side
Green marks the cheaper, bigger or better-performing fund on each line. Past returns are not a reliable guide to the future.
| HACK | BUGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Betashares | Global X |
| Index | Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index | Indxx Cybersecurity Index |
| Fee (a year) | 0.67% | 0.47% |
| Size | $1.7b | $25m |
| Net money in, September | −$3m | −$5m |
| 1-year return | +25.8% | +20.4% |
| 5-year return | +102% | Not 5 years old |
| Listed | 2016 | 2023 |
| Top 10 holdings | 55% of fund | 64% of fund |
| Trend now | Uptrend | Uptrend |
How much do HACK and BUGG overlap?
About 42% of their holdings are the same, by weight: medium overlap, so there is a fair amount of double-up.
The biggest companies they both own
| Company | HACK | BUGG |
|---|---|---|
| Crowdstrike Holdings IncInformation Technology | 8.6% | 7.4% |
| Palo Alto Networks IncInformation Technology | 7.6% | 6.7% |
| Fortinet IncInformation Technology | 6.3% | 5.2% |
| Okta IncInformation Technology | 4.5% | 9.5% |
| Zscaler IncInformation Technology | 4.4% | 6.0% |
| Rubrik IncInformation Technology | 3.0% | 6.0% |
| Check Point Software Tech LInformation Technology | 2.1% | 3.2% |
| Gen Digital IncInformation Technology | 2.1% | 3.5% |
| Akamai Technologies IncInformation Technology | 1.8% | 3.1% |
| Qualys IncInformation Technology | 1.1% | 6.3% |
Only in HACK
- Cisco Systems Inc 7.5%
- Broadcom Inc 7.0%
- Cloudflare Inc 3.6%
- F5 Inc 2.8%
- Accenture PLC 2.7%
Only in BUGG
- Sailpoint Inc 4.6%
- Sentinelone In 4.3%
- Commvault System 4.1%
- Ahnlab Inc 0.9%
- Ncc Group plc 0.7%
Sectors and countries
Sectors
Countries
Trend: base, uptrend or downtrend?
Past year of prices, shaded by trend stage. The dashed line is the 200-day exponential average. As at 4 November 2026. How base and trend works.
HACK or BUGG: which suits who?
Where either fits depends on the rest of your portfolio: whether it’s your core or a satellite. See core and satellite investing and our full profiles of HACK.
See the exact overlap with everything you hold, plus the trend of each ETF, in our free calculator.
More comparisons
HACK vs BUGG FAQs
Is HACK or BUGG better?
Neither is better for everyone. Both hold global cybersecurity companies. HACK is the older and much bigger fund; BUGG is newer, with a lower fee and a different index. Choose HACK if you want the biggest, longest-running cybersecurity ETF on the ASX. Choose BUGG if you want a lower fee and are comfortable with a smaller, newer fund.
What is the difference between HACK and BUGG?
HACK and BUGG overlap by about 42%: there is a fair amount of double-up. BUGG is cheaper (0.47% vs 0.67% a year), about $200 a year less on $100,000. HACK is the bigger fund ($1.7b vs $25m). Both hold global cybersecurity companies. HACK is the older and much bigger fund; BUGG is newer, with a lower fee and a different index.
Should I own both HACK and BUGG?
You can, but check the double-up: about 42% of their holdings are the same. Use the overlap calculator to see how they fit with your other ETFs.
Which is cheaper, HACK or BUGG?
BUGG is cheaper (0.47% vs 0.67% a year), about $200 a year less on $100,000. Fees are taken from the fund’s returns, not charged separately.
Fees, size, flows and returns: TMX Australia Funds Report to 30 September 2026; returns are total returns and the 5-year figure is cumulative. Overlap, sectors and countries are based on each fund’s published holdings, scaled to the part of each fund we can see. Trend stages are a technical indicator based on 10, 20, 50 and 200-day exponential moving averages; they describe the past, not the future. General information only, not a recommendation to buy or sell HACK or BUGG. Consider the PDS and TMD, and your own circumstances, before investing.